Deaths In Custody from Unnatural Causes

More than 100 deaths in custody in two years reported

There are a few cases of reported deaths in custody by online news media that will be interesting to highlight for public awareness.

These few cases mentioned here has to be viewed in the context of the more than 100 deaths in two years in Malaysia immigration custody that was reported.

We (me and other detainees) have witnessed one suspected death in custody during my detention in Pekan Nanas. He is an Indian national that was suspected to have died from rat urine poisoning.

It is because of this that I am drawn into researching and analyzing these deaths in custody to find any links between many of these deaths in custody.

Grieving families of deceased seeks closures

As for those past cases that are reported in the medias, it is natural that the families of these deceased migrant workers to be grief stricken. They are also justifiably angry at the authorities that failed them. Lastly it is important they can have closures

It is also understandably suspicious that their loved one who was strong and healthy could just died suddenly in custody and case closed. This is something most normal persons find it hard to believe.

Two videos of deaths in custody reported by major news

A report published 22-Aug 2015 (video link below) was about an interview with two Indian workers who returned to India after their detention. One of them spent three months in detention before being repatriated back to Chennai. In the interview, quote: “though he did not complained of physical abuse, he alleged that one of his co-worker was beaten to death.” Unquote

In another case reported on 4-Aug 2016 (video link below), information surrounding his death in Malaysia is so little. How could a young and healthy man died suddenly while in immigration detention? It was also reported that his case was linked to agent fraud. Obviously there are so many questions that this deceased family wants answers. The families want to know the truth about their loved one’s death and hold whoever is accountable to face justice. It is indeed a sad and tragic situation for this deceased family’s loved ones.

Deaths in custody Case Study #1

A report dated 5.02.2018 last year (screenshot below), Indian detainee dies of “heart attack” while being deported. click here

As there was a suspected death in custody during my detention in Pekan Nanas around this time, I decided to do a review and analyze this piece of news for discrepancies.

Summary of main points

  1. A Malaysian NGO was reported to be involved in this. This NGO is Malaysia Global Rescue Humanity (MGRH). MGRH provides very little information about itself. A check also revealed that there is little information available about MGRH.
  2. It was reported in this short news that this MGRH helped to identify a 42-year old Indian national who died at KL airport. It was not about MGRH helping the Indian national detainee.
  3. Date of deportation is 29.01.2018 = date of death but the NGO received information of death after Jan 29, i.e. the day of deportation.
  4. The report stated that this Indian national was being detained for 3 months, meaning that deceased was under Immigration custody for three months.
  5. The report claimed the death occurred during deportation by the Malaysian immigration department. The place of death where it occurred was at KL international airport. The death was of a “heart attack”.
  6. What MGRH did

  7. The MGRH then appeared and claimed that it noticed that the face of the deceased was different from the photo on passport.
  8. But we know for a fact that to deport an immigration detainee, Immigration Department had already verified his passport or had obtained an official Outpass from the Indian Embassy.
  9. Instead MGRH jumped to the claim that the deceased was using another person’s passport during the deportation.
  10. Between the dates of MGRH being informed to this published news report is 6 days, i.e. from 30.1.2018 to 5.2.2018.
  11. MGRH claimed they managed to identify his real identity, track down the deceased wife who confirmed the identity. MGRH then collected the man’s original identification and contacted the Immigration, all completed within 6 days. Quite an astonishing feat but very doubtful that it can happened.
  12. Then MGRH claimed that it helped or arranged to repatriate the dead man body out from Malaysia.
  13. This news was then reported and published to the public on 5.2.2018.

Observations

  1. Clearly all the above facts point to a circular argument from analyzing the news report and other available information.
  2. It seems many of the facts are dubious in nature and cannot be verified or confirmed to be true.

NGO MGRH    Star news dtd 5.2.2018Screenshot, courtesy of “The Star Online”

Deaths in custody Case study #2

Summary of main points

  1. MGRH president, Mr. T Kamalanathan received a complaint from the deceased wife Stella Rani.
  2. MGRH claimed deceased wife says that Martin Dass is an Indian citizen from Keela Stanmantapuram, Tiruvarur Dt, Tamilnadu,
  3. Martin Dass came to Malaysia to work as a general worker three months ago with tourist visa. It identified him as an illegal migrant worker and not a tourist.
  4. It claim that last one month, Martin was admitted at the General Hospital Kuala Lumpur Malaysia for lungs infection.
  5. The story continues that on the 28.01.2019, Martin passed away.
  6. The deceased wife is included in the story. MGRH claimed Madam Stella Rani called Mr. Kamalanathan to help to release her husband’s body.
  7. The hospital had refused to release the deceased body due to pending hospital bills outstanding amounted RM 15,379.00.
  8. Madam Stella Rani also requested The High Commission of India in Malaysia but refused to help her with the outstanding bills.
  9. Mr. Kamalanathan met the in-charge officer in the hospital billing department but the officer refused to give a release letter.
  10. It was claimed that if the outstanding not settled within 14 days the burier will be done by hospital department.
  11. Mr. Kamalanathan wrote a letter to the health ministry and visit them personally and explained about the deceased family financial situation.
  12. He also requested to waive the outstanding bills of RM 15,379.00.
  13. The health ministry immediately gave a letter to hospital to release the body to Mr. Kamalanathan.
  14. On the 5.02.2019 Martin Dass’s body was sent to his family in India by Sri Lanka Airlines at 10.30 am.

Observations

In the above-mentioned case; the statement “came to Malaysia to work as a general worker three months ago with tourist visa”. This tells us that he has broken immigration law and not a tourist. He has been identified as an illegal and is definitely in immigration custody.

From date of death to repatriation to India was a total of eight days. What is the rot condition of a dead body after eight days?

The important question is why would the hospital treats a walk-in patient who cannot provides any financial guarantee for his medical fee (RM15,379). It is suspected that the person is admitted under Government’s order, i.e. Immigration’s Order.

So instead of a death by unnatural causes while in immigration custody, it is now a story of a death of an Indian tourist from an illness in a Malaysia hospital.

death in immigration custody

Considering the death on 9th July 2019 involving a Nigerian student, there are certainly lots of questions to be asked and answered. The families of these deceased need answers so that there is closure for them.

Give five stars to support if you have enjoyed this post.

As you found this post useful...

Follow us on social media!

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

Leave a Comment

Archives

Journal Entries of 35-days Detention (Part 3 to 6)

By daves | February 22, 2023

Pekan Nenas Immigration detention Depot is run and managed by the Immigration Dept.
It is used for the detention of foreigners whether illegal foreign workers, overstayers or any foreigner that are arrested under the Immigration Act. The facility is shrouded in secrecy, hidden away from public eyes while foreigners are detained in hostile, oppressive, unhygienic, and inhumane conditions. This post takes a look at what a foreigner can expect their day and lives to be liked once he or she is locked inside here. It also includes life inside Kluang prison.

Judicial Review on Police Inaction

By daves | January 29, 2023

Ensuring police action is to find out the truth of the matter concerning these three matters, namely: Was there a dark scheme by Immigration officers to fix me together with the vengeful ex-housekeeper? What were the motives behind the two parts illegal detentions? What was the real reason and motive for a merciless lifetime blacklist?

5 Chinese detainees in Malaysia

By daves | December 2, 2022

Help back home! 5 men in Henan were detained in Malaysia for 2 months, but could not board the plane after buying a ticketDahe Daily 2021-11-22 21:22 Posted on Henan…

Equality of justice is universal

By daves | November 26, 2022

The Malaysian FC Art. 8(1) enshrines the following:
“All persons are equal before the law and entitled to the equal protection of the law.”
I was detained illegally for 26 days in hostile, oppressive and inhumane immigration detention depot. For this abuse of human rights, I have made police reports to the Malaysian police. By the same token, in accordance with FC Art. 8 law, immigration officers perpetrating these crimes must be penalized in accordance with the Penal Code.

正义平等是国际性的

By daves | November 26, 2022

马来西亚联邦宪法第8(1)条规定如下: “法律面前人人平等,有权受到法律的平等保护。 马来西亚联邦宪法第8(1)条规定的这项法律是真的还是假的? 背景 当我在2018年2月28日被捕时,我被连续拘留到26千2018年3月的一天。这一天早上,我被带到移民法庭的治安法官面前,要么认罪,要么不认罪。(所有与案件有关的详细信息均可在吉隆坡高等法院文件和上诉法院文件中找到)。 2018年3月26日上午,在被拘留27天后,我和其他大约20人被带到北干内纳斯仓库移民特别法庭的治安法官面前,面对指控。宣读控罪后,裁判官问我认罪与否。 11名被捕者中有6名被发现在我的财产上。从未提及的实质性重要事实是,一名移民官员与他的已婚女友一起住在这处房产上。两人于2018年1月31日被驱逐。附上他的移民证副本。 我可以不认罪,移民局会把我带回大牢房,继续把我关多久,尽可能强迫我承认指控。原因是我是外国人,没有人可以挑战移民官员的权力。现在马来西亚高等法院100%证明情况确实如此。即使有法院的解除令,他们坚决不会让我自由,并且非常有信心没有人能够干预。如果这还不够恶毒,即。移民官员用我的生命玩俄罗斯轮盘赌,那是什么? 或者我可以认罪,接受判决并继续前进,因为那天早上有一长串罪犯等待轮到他们认罪。 事后看来,我知道我认罪的决定是正确的。如果我不认罪,这意味着我将被关押在Pekan Nenas Depot内数周和数月,我会死于心脏病发作。我目睹了另一名被拘留者在我被拘留期间死亡。这个仓库的被拘留者在可怕的不卫生条件下受到残酷和不人道的待遇,被拘留者在拘留期间死亡,疾病在被拘留者中传播。 吉隆坡高等法院于2021年5月4日宣布,我没有在2018年3月12日被带到裁判官面前,要求还押令允许马来西亚移民局拘留我。因此,从2018年3月13日至2018年3月26日,这是非法,非法和违宪的拘留。随后,马来西亚政府对法院的这项命令提出上诉。 2022年10月31日,由三名法官组成的上诉法院一致下令驳回马来西亚政府的上诉,并向我支付10,000令吉的费用。附上上诉法院命令的副本。 四名马来西亚法官宣布,我从2018年3月13日至2018年3月26日的13天拘留是非法、非法和违宪的。 刑事罪行 #1 根据《马来西亚刑法典》第574条第344款,这种非法、非法和违宪的拘留显然是犯罪行为。 第344条规定如下:任何人错误地将任何人监禁十天或十天以上,应处以三年以下监禁,并处以罚款。 我于2021年12月8日向警方报案,L20211208_2005了该罪行的肇事者。这份警方报告是根据马来西亚驻新加坡高级专员公署2021年12月6日的电子邮件中的明确指示提交的。在提交警方报告后,马来西亚高级专员公署通过日期为 24-3-2022 的电子邮件确认收到了警方报告。 2022年3月21日,我的律师通过电子邮件询问警方报告的状态。作为回应,马来西亚皇家警方于2022年4月28日向我的律师发送了一封电子邮件,要求以下内容:“我们已将您的案件提交给马来西亚皇家警察刑事调查部法律与起诉部门,他们通知我们,由于您代表您的客户黄振权先生在新加坡,并且他报告的事件发生在柔佛州, 马来西亚恳请代表您的客户在马来西亚提交任何正式的警方报告,并提供有关其投诉的所有证明文件,以便我们的警方采取进一步的必要行动。 我的律师在2022年4月28日的电子邮件中回复如下:“但是,我认为必须有一个机制让海外的受屈人提出投诉,我非常认为该机制必须是受屈人必须在马来西亚领事馆提出投诉,领事馆应将其转发给您,供您采取行动。但是,如果对受屈的人有任何其他机制,请告诉我,以便我可以将其传达给我的客户。你会明白,事实上,投诉,要具有应有的分量,必须由对此事有个人了解的人提出。我期待听到我的客户从新加坡提出投诉的机制。 虽然马来西亚皇家警察给出的新要求与马来西亚高级专员公署相矛盾,但必须清楚的是,对我来说,要满足这一要求,即。为了在马来西亚土地上提交警方报告,马来西亚政府必须为此目的批准我进入马来西亚的移民通行证。但马来西亚皇家警察选择忽视这个问题。 随后,马来西亚皇家警察没有维护所有公平和平等的正义,而是发出了一封日期为27-5-2022的正式信函,声明 “PDRM将来不会就此事采取进一步的后续行动”或大意如此。附上用马来语写的信的副本。 我的律师被指示对这封信提出异议,并在一封日期为 2022…

Criminal offences under penal code

By daves | November 13, 2022

This post is about alleged criminal offences under the penal code committed by Malaysian Immigration officers against me. After I have won the legal challenges against the Malaysian Immigration authorities…