Journeying the trail of deceits

Journeying the trail of deceits is a post to challenge and expose some unscrupulous officials’ attempt to brand someone as “criminal” by using deceits. At the end of this post, we can see that such officials themselves are likely in that category.

So this is the start of a journey along rough and difficult terrains fighting “dark enemies”, trying to get to the “light at the end of the tunnel”. There is a saying that darkness cannot overwhelm light and evil cannot overcome good. With this conviction, I started to walk this journey.

As we journey on this trail, we see the trail is scattered with officials’ deceits being exposed and on displayed.

Start of journey on trail of deceits

On the 16.07.2019 (Tuesday), this marks the start of this journey on this trail of deceits.

It started with the launch of an Affidavit-in-Support (AIS) to sue the Malaysia Immigration Department over my 37 days detention saga.

From the affidavits throughout the legal suit, points relating to the 37 days detention saga, events and snippets of such points were used to help tell the story.

This 37 days detention infringed my constitutional rights as a Singapore citizen and even as a foreigner in Malaysia does not deserves this according to the constitutional rights guaranteed under the Malaysia Federal Constitution.

Constitutional safeguards missing in trail of deceits

My Malaysia counsel advised me that the Malaysia Immigration officers infringe my constitutional rights by not presenting me before a Magistrate for a lawful detention.

Firstly, they did not presented within 24 hours and then secondly they also did not presented within 14 days. They only presented me before a Magistrate after 26 days, a serious violation of the Malaysia Federal Constitution.

However there was no recourse for me against these unscrupulous officers until I sued these Immigration officials in the Malaysia High Court.

Snippet of AIS para 39 and para 40:

trail of deceits-1
trail of deceits-2
Job 29:14 – I put on righteousness and it clothed me: my judgment was as a robe and a diadem.

Respondent’s denial found on trail of deceits

On the 06.08.2019 (Tuesday), the Immigration Investigation Officer (the same officer who led the raid and arrested me) responded to my AIS with his Respondent’s Affidavit-In-Opposition (AIO).

Snippet of AIO

trail of deceits-3

English translated version

trail of deceits-4

Snippet of AIO para 10 (original in Malays language):

This Investigating officer makes a blanket denial of every point in my affidavit and makes an unsubstantiated claim that I was “detained in accordance with the procedures prescribed by law”.

trail of deceits-5
snippet of AIO para 10 (Malay version)

English translated version

trail of deceits-6
An unsubstantiated claim under a general statement “procedures prescribed by law”

Unsubstantiated claim found on trail of deceits

On the 24.08.2019 (Saturday) I submitted my Affidavit-In-Reply (AIR) to Respondent’s Affidavit-In-Opposition (AIO) to rebut his unsubstantiated and unsupported claim as follows:

 Snippet of AIR Para 8 and 9

trail of deceits-7
Rebutting Respondent’s false allegation (para 10)

And snippet of AIR Conclusion Para 13 – 16

trail of deceits-8
Conclusion of my AIR, para 13 – para 16

I have put forth a challenge to allow me to cross-examine the Investigation officer on how he presented me before a Magistrate since I have only seen him once throughout my 37 days detention.

Para 13 of AIR must have unnerved him that he strongly objected to my application to be in Court to cross-examine him regarding his “claim” that he personally brought me before the Magistrate.

Devil is the father of lies

Surprisingly two days later, on the 26.08.2019 (Wednesday), another Immigration officer jumped in and filed a Respondent’s Further-Affidavit-In-Opposition (FAIO)

Snippet of FAIO Depot Pekan Nanas Commander

trail of deceits-9

English translated version

1.    I am a Commander in the Immigration Depot Unit of Malaysia, Pekan Nanas, Pontian, Johor

Snippet of FAIO Para 16 and para 17

trail of deceits-10

English translated version

trail of deceits-11
trail of deceits-12

Now the storyline had changed hastily from “the Investigating Officer personally presented me before a Magistrate”; to “the Commander of Pekan Nanas arraigned me in court before a Magistrate”.

To support her claim, she submitted Exhibit HB-1

Snippet of Exhibit HB-1

trail of deceits-13

Exhibit HB-1 Pg 1

trail of deceits-14

And Exhibit HB-1 pg 2

trail of deceits-15

From the snippets above, we can see that the numbering system print-out from the fax machine indicated that there is a set of three-page document. But page 3 of 3 is missing from this exhibit.

Why is pg 3 missing? We can only guessed that it does not suit their narrative.

New allegation of “arraignment in court”

When I averred that I saw the Investigation officer only once, this Commander step into the picture. Now it is this Commander who “arraigned” me before Magistrate.

I don’t even knew who this person or seen her at all. How did she qualified to make this allegation that she arraigned me in court before a Magistrate? From the Investigating Officer alluding vaguely that he personally brought me personally before a Magistrate to this Commander’s allegation. The story keeps changing.

The FAIO made a new claim, i.e. the Commander of Pekan Nanas Depot arraigned me in court. In response, we submitted a Further-Affidavit-In-Reply (FAIR) refuting this allegation on 18.09.2019 (Wednesday).

In fact in another affidavit (OS_D-AIR Para 10) months later, the Investigation Officer averred that he personally brought me before the Magistrate. This Investigating officer cannot keep his story straight throughout the whole court episode as you reads on.

Snippet of FAIR Para 11 and 12

trail of deceits-16

Real evidence appeared in trail of deceits

The beauty of justice

27.11.2019 (Wednesday) was the day of the High Court hearing. The Malaysia Immigration barred me from entering Malaysia to attend the hearing and cross-examine witnesses. I could only be represented by counsel throughout the hearing without my participation.

During the open court hearing, Immigration inadvertently handed a hard copy of HB-1 pg 3 of 3 to my counsel who then forwarded the same copy to me. As this official court document came from the Immigration side, it is the most important piece of irrefutable evidence proving that I was never presented before a Magistrate.

This is indeed an act of divine intervention on my behalf. Thank you Lord Jesus!

However my counsel had the presence of mind not to speak about this piece of hard copy document during the hearing but kept and delivered to me for further instructions.

No matter how they can vehemently deny, we can be pretty sure that they cannot denied their own official documents.

Snippet of HB-1 Pg 3 of 3

trail of deceits-17

The High Court Judge delivered his judgment and oral verdict on 19.12.2019 (Thursday).

Snippet of the Judge’s verdict.

trail of deceits-18

Hope in the form of Immigration’s gift along this trail of deceits

Through divine intervention, putting in my hand this piece of crucial evidence, this ignited my hope. We can now continue to fight. We lodged an appeal to Court of Appeal against the earlier court’s verdict whereby the Justice dismissed my application.

At the same time, we used this evidence to sue the Malaysia Immigration for unlawful detention in violation of Article 5 of the Malaysia Federal Constitution.

With the most crucial piece of evidence, we submitted our Originating Summon (OS) on 20.01.2020 (Monday).

trail of deceits-19

Snippet of OS Para 13 and 14

trail of deceits-20

First Case Management along this trail of deceits

The court registrar set the first CM on 12.02.2020 (Wednesday), 9.00 am.

However as expected when faced with such a crucial piece of evidence, inadvertently given by Immigration starring in his face, the Immigration Investigating Officer (Defendant) failed to attend this first CM.

For his failure to turn up for this first CM without any justification, the Registrar just let it passed without any censure or penalty.

The Registrar re-scheduled a second CM on 27.02.2020 (Thursday).

Defendant’s Affidavit-In-Reply D-AIR

In response to my Plaintiff’s Affidavit-In-Support (P-AIS), the Defendant has a deadline for his submission of the D-AIR. The deadline is latest 20.02.2020 (Thursday).

Similarly as for the first CM, he would have to come up with a water-tight answer to the piece of evidence starring him in the face in his D-AIR.

And as expected when he could not come up with a water-tight answer, he could not meet the deadline nor did he request an official extension from the court. In plain term, he failed to submit and with most Justices, the court will award me the case based on non-submission (throwing in the towel).

Was I surprised that this did not happened? No! After all this is not my country and I am an outsider in their eyes.

Second Case Management along this trail of deceits

The Registrar scheduled a second CM on 27.02.2020 (Thursday).

And not surprisingly on the 27.02.2020, my counsel informed me that the Defendant again failed to attend this second CM without any justification.

Similar to the first CM of absence without justification, there is neither censure nor penalty for such blatant disregard of court dates by this Defendant (Immigration Investigating officer). That speaks a lot of what the justice system means for an outsider like me.

Defendant filing an out-of-time Affidavit-In-Reply

The Defendant (Immigration) filed his D-AIR on 14.05.2020 which was way past the 20.02.2020 deadline.

His filing was out-of-time by twelve weeks but yet the court accepted this out-of-time filing by Defendant. The excuse for acceptance was because of extension of time granted by court Registrar due to MCO.

However MCO started on 18.03.2020 (Wednesday), after the 20.02.2020 deadline. What a great way to lie by the Defendant with FC and DR being complicit.

Snippet of the excuse for out-of-time filing of D-AIR

trail of deceits-21

Defendant’s out-of-time Affidavit-In-Reply

Snippet of OS_D-AIR Para 10

trail of deceits-22
English translated version

Snippet of OS_D-AIR Exhibit

trail of deceits-23

A LIE is still a LIE in trail of deceits

Proverbs 6:16-17 – The LORD hates lying tongue

Defendant had made a patently false claim in his out-of-time D-AIR para 10 with a re-typed copy of Magistrate Order as exhibit. This exhibit is a re-typed Order provided by a different Magistrate with no Magistrate’s signature on the Order and different from the original Order. What was the role of this unrelated-to-case Magistrate?

An interesting news article dated 09.08.2021 recently is of interest here. Ex-magistrate ordered to enter defense in RM295k corruption case.

In response to that false claim, we filed an Affidavit-In-Reply on 10.06.2020 (Wednesday).

P-AIR para 10 once again reiterated the truth of the matter with facts and with evidences, not merely words without substantiation.

Snippet of OS_P-AIR para 10

It must be reiterated here that I have seen this Defendant (Immigration Officer) only once, i.e. that was on the night he arrested me and no more after that as stated on my AIR Conclusion Para 13. What a blatant lie on oath before God by this Immigration Investigating Officer!

Snippet of AIR Conclusion para 13:

Submissions by both parties

Both parties file their submissions simultaneously on 15.10.2020 (Thursday).

On our side, we submit on these two issues. Should Justice ruled against me on the first issue, we will proceed on second issue.

1.             The issue (First Issue) for determination by this Honorable Court is whether the Plaintiff was produced before a Magistrate on 12.03.2018.

2.             If the court were to find against the Plaintiff in the above said issue, then a bigger issue of whether the Amendment Act by which the original Art. 5(4) requiring production of anyone arrested before a Magistrate within 24 hours, a constitutional safeguard and guarantee of personal liberty, is invalid for infringing the original Art. 5(4) and Art. 8(1) [equality before the law], by virtue of basic structure jurisprudence founded on Sixth Schedule oath taken by the MPs to preserve, protect and defend the constitution (Second Issue).

Court Hearing Dates

The Court scheduled the hearing on 12.11.2020 (Thursday).

But on three occasions we received last minute notices one or two days before scheduled hearings. On these 3 occasions, I was informed that the hearing will be vacated to new dates nearly two months later:

1st new date was on 25.01.2021

2nd new date was on 10.03.2021

3rd new date was on 04.05.2021

Finally after nearly six months of delays and patient waiting, the case went before the Justice.

Looking at how this case took nearly one and a half year, I can look back to 26.03.2018 and know that I have made the right decision to plead guilty to get out alive from the cruel and inhumane Immigration detention depot. This whole episode would have been the nightmare for me if I would have chosen to be put through their justice system then. Imagine dealing with so many crooked people as seen here. Thanks goodness!

Conclusion at end of trail of deceits

The view of Justice on the Immigration officer’s affidavit in view of the documentary evidence, i.e. the original order given into my hands by Immigration department, during the hearing. See snippet below:

Justice is addressed as Yang Arif (YA)

At the end of the hearing, the wise Justice declared that my detention by Malaysia Immigration Department unlawful.

On top of the unlawful detention up to 26-03-2018, there is a further period from the 27-03-2018 to 05-04-2018, the evil Immigration officers continued their detention deliberately.

This is solely because I am a foreigner with no rights and power within Malaysia to stop their blatant abuse of power. This period of extrajudicial detention is documented here and here.

Proverbs from King Solomon, the wisest man on earth

Give five stars to support if you have enjoyed this post.

As you found this post useful...

Follow us on social media!

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

Simon Koh

Simon Koh

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Documentary On Undocumented Migrants

By Simon Koh | August 20, 2020

Documentary on undocumented migrants that enraged the government leads to police raid on Al Jazeera. “KUALA LUMPUR – Malaysian police raided the office of news broadcaster Al Jazeera and two…

Poor Indian villager

Deaths In Custody from Unnatural Causes

By Simon Koh | August 5, 2019

More than 100 deaths in custody in two years reported There are a few cases of reported deaths in custody by online news media that will be interesting to highlight…

immigration detention

Long History of Recorded Malaysia Immigration Abuses And Complaints

By Simon Koh | August 4, 2019

Documented records of Immigration abuses and complaints A video titled: “Immigration officer caught on camera assaulting foreigner -Malaysia” in Johor Baru sparked off a public outrage. This uncivilized behavior of…

Treated Like Animals At Detention Center

By Simon Koh | August 3, 2019

Filipinos mums being treated like animals Treated like animals at a detention center in Malaysia,a group of Filipinos mothers and their children were finally reunited. These mothers went through living…

nigerian death tragedy

Death Of Nigerian PhD Student In Malaysia Immigration Custody

By Simon Koh | August 2, 2019

Shocking news on death of Nigerian PhD student in immigration custody This is about the shocking news of a foreigner, a Nigerian-national who died in immigration custody. He holds a…